skip to main |
skip to sidebar
6:58 PM
Reut R. Cohen
Pictured: Imam Musa and Ward Churchill. We got a two-for-one special at UCI today!
See how they wear their "UC Intifada" garb proudly.
Check out Ward Churchill contributing to human pollution. Thanks for leaving your cigarette butts on my campus.
In the video clip above, Churchill urges students with the MSU to go to the pro-Israel booth on Ring Road, to eat a slice of the cake they have, to "get a plate, [and] proceed symbolically to eat the state of Israel." He also discusses "liberation" and "resistance." Somehow Ward Churchill made his way into the pro-Israel booth today, and took a slice of cake and a t-shirt. I have no idea how this happened and why he was allowed into the booth by students. However, I question him later on about this and more (that video is on the way as soon as I can get it to upload on Google).
6 comments. Leave a comment:
Churchill is a clown. He had his 15 minutes. He needs to move on.
Clown is right. They need to fire this guy. He is a disgrace.
Of course the MSU would be the ones to bring him. The MSU is also a disgrace.
Although I hear that the Department of History is looking to hire someone at UCI... Churchill can probably easily get employment AND tenure in Irvine.
Hello there!
Good posts about Wardo.
I have a blog about him, too.
http://www.legendofpineridge.blogspot.com
I think it is fair to say that there stand two anti-Semites.
Reut, I have been sticking up for you against Churchill lackey Benjamin Whitmer, a CU Ethnic Studies adjunct lecturer, who has a blog on which he and Churchill under the pseudonym, Charley Arthur, often post their pathetic vitriol. It's interesting if only to see how crazy these people are. Check it out.
http://tryworks.org/blog/2007/05/15/having-his-cake-and-eating-it-too/#comments
Hi Reut,
This is Sobia--we took Georgianna's class together? Remember? You send me your notes--thanks for that again. Mmm.. "flaming anti-semite," which "innocent Americans" (surely not the first ones or the current ones?), and have you defined "intifada" or "shahid"/shaheed--not from bias resources mind you, but authentic, educated resources.
I believe there may be some discrepency in the definitions and your percieved connotations. You don't have to reply on your blog--I'm not sure if this'll post or you'll get a chace to read this first.
I'd rather this be a private conversation, so that you'll feel comfortable asking questions or debating issues that you feel bother you. However, if you'd like it to be public, that doesn't bother me either.
As far as the person I heard waved her camera "in your face" as I read another article claiming, I know her personally. I highly doubt she did so agressively, or purposely. I do notice though you took the liberty of posting pictures of "Muslim" students who you didn't have clear-cut permission for either. Just putting things in perspective.
Anyways, sorry to stray from the point: I'd like you to feel free, open, and comfortable speaking with any member of the MSU about things that seem to be bothering you regarding their activies. Or, at least, feel free and comfortable to talk to me, as a classmate, and I'll be glad to clear up any misconceptions.
I feel like you're attacking Muslims and the Islamic faith here, and I'm not sure if that's your intention.
This is getting a little long, so I'll end right here, and give you time to think over what I've suggested.
In the mean time,
Payce,
Sobia
(My e-mail is shrimpy_sobz@yahoo.com -- I'd appreciate if you could keep this to yourself. I get enough spam mail as it is. X_x Haha, thanks!)
Post a Comment
Comments and feedback are welcome and appreciated. Please stay on topic and avoid profanities unless it is relevant to the discussion. By commenting on the site, you agree that you are not impersonating anyone else and that you are solely responsible for the content you post. In commenting on the website you agree that you are not violating copyright or intellectual property rights of others. Spam and commercial posts are not permitted and will not be published. Disagreement and debates are welcome, but comments which are slanderous, demeaning, obscene, resort to ad hominem, and/or are of a threatening nature will not be published. Opinions expressed in the comments section do not necessarily reflect the views of the website’s author. The author of the website reserves the right to reject or remove comments at any time and for any reason.